Introduction
Recently, my wife had me read a short article about
self-compassion. Two things about this I found interesting: 1) the article, and
2) the fact of my wife’s recommending it. Obviously she feels I could be better
at self-compassion, and I suppose I agree. So why shouldn’t I just have you
read that article? One, I lost it. Two, it had the common flaw of trying to
appeal to too broad an audience by being really brief—a series of five tiny
nibbles that added up to an unsatisfying snack. In this post I’ll delve deeper,
and ask a thorny question: why do I have so much trouble with this?
What’s wrong with
self-compassion?
I guess to begin with I should define the term. Wikipedia’s description does a sufficient job: “Self-compassion is extending compassion to one’s self in instances of
perceived inadequacy, failure, or general suffering.” It’s basically cutting
yourself some slack.
Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think there’s anything wrong
with this. Self-compassion leads to all kinds of benefits; Wikipedia lists life
satisfaction, happiness, and emotional resilience, and the article I read said
something about reduced inflammation.
And yet, something about self-compassion makes me
instinctively bristle. Delving into this reaction, I’ll confess that to some
degree, it’s simply a habit. I grew up the youngest of four boys, and if there’s
a polar opposite to compassion, my brothers exercised it at every turn. If I
hurt myself, or even if they hurt me, they would say, “Ohhhh, poor baby! Did that hurt? You poor, poor thing!” This was delivered with the most
brittle, icy sarcasm available—which was a lot. To visibly suffer was to demand
sympathy, which was treated as a shameful act.
Perhaps our father helped create this culture. I remember
how, when I was 12, my brand-new bike was stolen during the few minutes I spent
using a San-O-Let at a bike race. Far from expressing sympathy, my dad was
livid. “If you had spent your money on a good lock instead of a fancy cycling
cap, you’d still have your bicycle!” he thundered at me. This was a pretty
typical scenario, so I guess I’m not surprised that my natural reaction to any
personal failure is still self-flagellation.
But in a sense, my hesitation to grant myself some compassion isn’t
wholly irrational. On a very conscious level, I take some issue with compassion
in general, if it’s applied too generously. As I’ve written before in these pages, “For every person who pushes himself too hard and needs to lighten up, I’d
say there are 10 who are just too complacent to push their comfort zone.” Something
about self-compassion strikes me as defeatist—like, by the time you’re doling
out compassion, you’ve kind of given up, haven’t you? Shouldn’t we temper our our magnanimous acceptance with an opposing effort to
encourage and challenge?
This is all very abstract, so I’ll give an example. For the
past few years, I’ve coached high school mountain biking. The afternoon before every race, our team rides
the course. Early in the season, one of the new riders showed up for the
pre-ride but suddenly balked. “Coach, I can’t race tomorrow,” he said. “I’m
having trouble breathing.”
Nothing about asthma or bronchospasm was mentioned in this
rider’s pre-season medical evaluation, and he looked fine to me. Was it time to
be compassionate? Of course! I looked him right in the eye and said, “Wow, I’m
really sorry you’re such a pussy.”
No, of course I
didn’t really say that! (Just having a little fun here … this essay was
starting to drag.) I decided compassion was indeed called for with regard to
the obvious butterflies in this kid’s stomach, but I wasn’t ready to concede
that he had a bona fide breathing problem. So I told him, “Hey, how about you
go ahead with the pre-ride, see how that goes, and decide in the morning if you
feel like you can race.” Well, once he got out on the course, he started having
fun, gradually picked up the pace, and next thing you know he was leading the
team. At the end I told him, “Hey, the way you were riding today, I sure hope
you can race tomorrow.” Which he did. (I asked him afterward, “Are you glad you
raced?” To which he grinned, “No.”)
How does this tough-it-out business play in my own life?
Well, it definitely causes me stress. For example, when I bought a new dishwasher,
I really wanted to just pay someone to install it and be done with it, but I’d
have felt like a wuss. The uncharitable side of me demanded that I man up and figure it out for myself.
I reached out to my brother, and though he’s far more supportive today than in
the “Ohhhh, poor baby!” days, he wasn’t letting me off the hook, either. By
egging me on, and in fact questioning my manhood, Bryan applied powerful
pressure, which gave me the motivation to continue. If instead he’d shown the
same compassion as my wife had (something like, “Just hire somebody … you have
more important things to do”), I’d be out a bunch of money and would’ve missed
out on the satisfaction of rising to the occasion (and blogging about it).
Another issue I have is that, given my privileged life, self-compassion
can feel indulgent and even ungrateful. I’m lucky enough to live in the Bay
Area, to have close family and friends, and to enjoy good health—and any one of
these privileges ought to be enough to keep me from ever feeling sorry for
myself. To accept others’ solicitude, or grant it to myself, feels like
tempting fate … as though God might say (perhaps in my late father’s voice), “I’ll give you
something to cry about!”
So … will
self-compassion make you a wuss?
So is that it? Should stoicism and a hard line always trump compassion?
Of course not. Self-compassion, I must admit, is often appropriate given the
various assaults that even a life of privilege can wage on our emotional health.
With all these gifts, happiness can seem almost compulsory—like anything short
of flat-out elation, under these circumstances, is a kind of failure. We’re not
such rational creatures that we can simply talk ourselves out of feeling
inordinately bummed about this or that personal slight, unfulfilled ambition,
or grey day. Whatever our blessings, it’s hard not to compare them to the
better life and better self we could have if we could only just … just … whatever.
With this in mind, I’m ready to advance the idea that self-compassion doesn’t
just ease our burdens, lower our stress, and serve as a balm; it can actually
make us stronger.
How? Well, first of all, self-compassion can help us stand
up to our own egos when it comes to tackling something difficult. I’ll use
writing as an example. Something about spending a lot of time with one’s own
text is almost intrinsically soul-crushing. Several times already, during the
composition of this essay, I’ve fought the temptation to throw up my hands and
say, “This is boring! Nobody wants to read this! I should just stick with fart jokes!” And maybe you agree—but that shouldn’t stop me from trying, should it? Many a
wannabe writer gets so caught up in self-editing and self-critiquing that he fails, or
declines, to produce anything at all. If every wannabe succumbed to this
self-doubt, we’d have no writers, and nothing to read. The fact that this blog
exists attests to my charitable acceptance of “good enough.”
(Is “good enough” actually acceptable? I can’t help but to
keep asking this. But it is acceptable,
and here’s why: when I was trying to write back in high school, I was far worse
at it than I am today … but I’m still glad I made those early efforts. For one
thing, they document that time of my life, and where my head was, in a way that
memory cannot. Also, because I know I’ve improved, I can have fun taking shots
at my early stuff, as I’ve done here.)
In case you’ve never wanted to write, here’s a more
universal example: sometimes, by forgiving our physical limitations—especially
the ones imposed by age—we can set more modest fitness objectives for
ourselves, and thus do something rather than nothing. As a longtime cyclist, I’m
perennially drawn into the data-slave mentality of monitoring my performance throughout every ride. This habit has
become progressively more discouraging as I age, to the point that not
infrequently I’ll feel like giving up mid-ride and slinking home because I’m going so slow. But I’ve learned to temper this, and not just with self-talk (e.g., “Who
cares, it’s a nice day and a gorgeous road”). I have learned, on those bad
days, to ignore the heart rate and stopwatch altogether, by turning my bike
computer to “the weather channel.”
This doesn’t mean I won’t reflexively glance at the device to
see how I’m doing, but when I do I’m reminded to forget about performance. The
thermometer reminds me I’m not in control, that I’m subject to global forces
larger than myself. I’m letting myself off the hook.
My latest cycling breakthrough has been shortening my
standard route, to the point that I often ride for less than an hour (which I’ve
traditionally thought wasn’t even worth suiting up for). I’m acknowledging to
myself, “I’m 50. I’m busy. I’m tired. South Park is a bloody hard climb. It’s enough.” Is this a cop-out? Not as much as the dangerous
alternative: deciding I don’t have the time or energy for a proper ride so I’ll
just stay home.
The beauty of this scaled-down approach is that sometimes it
frees me to scale back up later. Half the time when I set out on the short
ride, I end up feeling okay after all. And once I’ve got the adrenaline going, I’ll throw in one more climb—a “bonus climb,”
so I can take it as slow as I want—and next thing I know I’m drilling it up
Canon Drive and ending up with a pretty sweet hit of endorphins.
Another way self-compassion defies self-indulgence: it takes
us out of ourselves, if we approach it the right way. If the opposite of
self-compassion is dwelling on our failures, we need to remind ourselves how
this affects those around us. When we suffer, so do they. Too much of this and we
become insufferably self-absorbed. When I fear I’m succumbing to this, I try look
at my situation from a loved one’s point of view and see if it looks as bleak
from there. If it doesn’t, that tells me something. Using this trick to forgive
myself thus reduces my self-absorption.
Finally, self-compassion helps me be more honest with myself.
How? Well, consider how hard it is to confess to something when you have no
expectation of forgiveness. I mentioned already how unforgiving my dad was;
need I mention that my brothers and I generally hid our blunders from him, even
when we could have really used his help? By the same token, if we can’t learn
to forgive ourselves when we fail, how can we expect to be really honest with
ourselves?
In other words, we might stoop to self-deception if the
alternative is too painful to face. For example, let’s say I get bawled out by my
boss. If I’m afraid to concede that she may have a point, I’m not likely to
take her criticism very well. Instead of seeing her perspective, I might succumb
to that self-protective reflex—to feel wronged, to decide she’s a jerk, and
to channel my inner Dilbert and shrug off the criticism. This isn’t
self-compassion—it’s denial! On the flip side, if I can forgive myself and be
honest, I’m more likely to see her point. In this way I can actually improve—so
my ability to forgive myself, so that I can face my failure and learn from it, is
more of a life tool than an indulgence.
So … we’re good here,
right?
Of course it’s easy enough to spew forth all these
platitudes (actually it’s not, I’m starting to gag), but putting them into
practice is another matter. I suppose I wrote this pro-compassion tract as much
to convince myself as to convince you, whoever you are. So I’ll make you a
deal: if you promise not to silently mock me for this earnest essay, I’ll try to do
the same.
~--~--~--~--~--~--~---~--
For a complete index of albertnet posts, click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment